Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Dow Chemical Company v. Ebling

Dow Chemical Company v. Ebling

Q • What is the Plaintiff’s argument in this case?

Q • What is the Defendants’ argument?• Why are they claiming they should not be sued under state tort law for failure to warn?• This case was remanded to the lower court for further proceedings. Suppose you worked for Affordable Pest Control. While you may not legally be under an obligation to warn those exposed to the pesticide of possible dangers, do you think it is in the company’s best interest to do so? Why or why not?

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

The issue of the case encircles around the fact; whether a private corporation i.e the Dow Chemical Company which has received threats with possible administrative cancellations of some particular herbicides that it especially manufactures and does induce through certain government orders. In order to disclose all forms of notes, reports, different working papers and most importantly the raw data related to on-going imperfect animal toxic based studies so that the information can further be evaluated considering its latent usage especially during the cancellation hearings (Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling, 2000).